I suppose we should be getting used to being embarrassed on the world stage. Certainly, every time Harper travels, I expect it, but I do hope that this time there will be much more backlash.
We at home know that Harper doesn't have a policy worth anything, concerning the environment, GHG's, etc. Geesh, half his supporters still think that climate change is a myth. We know too that he's been crafting a strategy, that would give the image that he's doing something, when in fact all he's done push the solutions further back. Because we've been passive here, specifically in reporting what Harper is not doing, perhaps he thinks he has a pass. Perhaps because at the recent meeting in Australia, he was bolstered by his buddies, he thought he had a pass.
I'm not sure what encouraged him to say what he did today, but we've lost all credibility now. Harper chose his friends, Bush and Howard over the rest of the planet. Actually, he formally announced that he's joined the APP, as it's now called. That's the group that courageously came forward to proclaim that they'd consider aspirational targets, in the future. So firm, so definitive, such leadership...in other words a joke. These men, cater to business, contemporary business, over the future effects to those who can ill afford to have more adversity.
No doubt his base is cheering, but given the overall reaction at the UN, I don't believe they realise the import of his choice. He has now officially put himself in the same league as Bush, that being, a head of state who speaks, but no one listens. If he thinks, that on the world stage this behaviour will go unnoticed, he's not the intelligent guy he's portrayed to be.
Going back to my post on Flanagan's 10 commandments, my sense is that on many issues, the con's have come to power, albeit minority power, too late. They may have had a chance to completely dupe us, earlier on, but at this point, Bush and Howard have made clear how duplicitous their agenda is. In emulating them, Harper alone is responsible for the criticism that should come his way. The question is, will it?
Robert Fife, usually a Harper cheerleader, surprised me today. He actually said that when the heavy hitters, Schwarzenegger and the Secretary General of the UN were speaking on the subject of climate change, Harper was shuffling papers, yawning and generally not engaged.
He cares nothing about this subject of course, but I hope to see pictures to substantiate that tomorrow. Will we?
Thankfully, the youth of our country, are more astute than Harper:
Harper drew sharp criticism from two Canadian youths participating in the one-day event. They said the Conservative government's emission targets are way too low.
"I, for one, am sick of being ashamed of my country and its poor behaviour on the world stage," P.J. Partington of the Canadian Youth Climate Coalition told a news conference.
"The government keeps saying Canada's playing a bridging role in the negotiations, but with our current plan we're on the road to nowhere."
Catherine Gauthier, who told leaders the future is in their hands and that too many world capitals are "spinning" their positions, was equally scathing.
"Canada needs to step up our action on climate change or get out of the way of progress," said Gauthier, a member of the Quebec-based Environnement Jeunesse.
"Our current targets won't yield real action until I am about to retire, which is completely out of line with the urgency of the science. We cannot play a constructive role in the international negotiations with our current plan."
”There are spin doctors in certain capitals that will try to convince you otherwise with their ‘diplomatic breakthroughs,' ‘bridges' and ‘complementary processes.' But there is only one road to a safe climate, and it leads to Bali,” said Ms. Gauthier, 18, who has addressed previous UN climate-change talks.
Sad isn't it? We used to be respected on this planet. Harper's ideas and ideals are old. The world fell into a silence after 9-11, a silence that aided agendas such as his. We are coming out of that, at least those of us who didn't buy it in the first place and those of us who were suspect. Fear is necessary for these people to exist and thankfully at the moment, we are not ensconced in it. Will that shift? Perhaps. The real question is, if it does, will we now, at long last, cast a critical eye to expose the propaganda?
When you choose your friends, you should choose them carefully. Harper chose those to whom he was aligned. Apparently, he was unable to crawl out of his ideology, so he missed the fact that they are on the way down. Hitch yourself to a falling star? Yep, that's what our guy at the top did. A falling star is gripping, but only while it lasts. Harper has hitched himself to that star, as it fizzles.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
10 comments:
Well said knb.
I couldn't help notice your accurate "Harper cheerleader" Fife reference. I just ventured over from my blog, where a Con troll actually said "Robert Fife is a Liberal through and through." These people are delusional, what next "National Post" socialist rag?
These are the people Harper has chosen to align himself with, in the fight against global warming.
"Robert Fife, usually a Harper cheerleader, surprised me today. He actually said that when the heavy hitters, Schwarzenegger and the Secretary General of the UN were speaking on the subject of climate change, Harper was shuffling papers, yawning and generally not engaged."
Last night on the news, Lloyd Robertson gave Fife an "out" - stating as a fact that Harper is concerned about global warming and wants to do something about it. I cannot remember the exact words, but effectively he opened the door to Fife saying that Harper wants to do something effective, and the APP is the way to do that.
Not - Harper believes this is the way to be effective, but that this IS the way to be effective.
I think I am starting to agree with you on media bias...
The two clueless youths that appered at the climate thing are positive proof that our "Public Indoctrination System" is in need of repair.
The one little snot said "I am ashamed of my Country" . . . what a total loser.
He is not old enough to have been out of the crib when Kyoto was concocted by Mo Strong, UN, Enviro-whackos and others with their hands out.
The previous lib regeme did nothing for 7 years . . . didn't seem to bother anyone.
Harper's one of the few folks talking sense . . . Canada only contributes 2% of the global CO2 emissions. If we dropped off the planet today, nothing would change, life would go on for the rest of the world and China would absorb our measly 2% in less than 52 weeks.
Common sense would dictate that any pollution regulation agreement that would be effective should include . . . . yea you guessed it . . . . the four largest polluters on the planet . . . right!!!!!
They are China, Russia, USA and India. These countries were all exempt from the now dead Kyoto Protocol.
Steve . . . who would you suggest we align ourselves with????
Maybe Chad, Cuba, Mexico and Abudabi.
You wouldn't want to align youself with the worlds larges polluters and work with them to solve the problems . . . trouble with libs is they just "FEEL" they are way to "EMO" to be in any positions of power!!!
Thanks for the link Steve. Harper of course kept up the lie today. What I'd love to see is someone burst out laughing when he makes his ridiculous claims.
That's really disappointing to read Gayle.
I've never been more convinced about the media. It's not to blame for everything, because people should be doing their own homework, but busy lives often prevent that.
Good grief oldschool. If I didn't know better I'd swear that you're proud of sticking your head in the sand.
What's you resistance to actually doing something concrete in this country? Don't want to change your lifestyle?
For the record, I'm ashamed of how Canada is behaving as well.
If Canada's intent was action, it wouldn't have spent all of last year selling a dye-in-the-wool step backwards to the iron age Plan; they then dumped that 'so-called' minister and replaced her with a tv-style CONangelican pitchman.
No neutral global groups have supported their efforts. That they wasted all this time just to confuse 40% of the electorate is pretty embarrassing, but then to try and disappear among the smoking stacks of China, USA, Australia and India sez too much.
You can't blame what you can't see, i suppose.
oldschool
Go back to school, your ignorance is alarming.
Post a Comment